Questionable Content

sodomymcscurvylegs:

brokeshibe:

automata-enthusiast:

brokeshibe:

automata-enthusiast:

brokeshibe:

sodomymcscurvylegs:

autisticemmett:

1972-012a:

somebody merged 40 of this guys comics together and it looks like this. he works for buzzfeed i think im allowed to make fun of him i mean look

this is what dissociation feels like 

I mean, you can tell they took all the comics and angled them and flipped them so the focus was the head repeated on the same panel. And, honestly? It’s not that serious; he’s consistent with his art and has a style, and he’s not exactly out there making separate art pieces, just a cohesive set of like…what, weekly comic strips? You could do this with virtually any comic strip you find. You could do this shit with Peanuts or Garfield or Calvin and Hobbes. This is an honest reach. What’s the issue here other than being petty?

this week on tungle.hellsite: tumblr calls out artists for being on model 

“being on model” is not “copy and pasting the same head in various orientations for every single comic”

You absolutely could NOT do that with Calvin and Hobbes without some extreme cherry picking.

you mean like OP did, with the 6 comics they used in the composite image above?

also how the hell do you people even find these untagged posts, do you just literally go searching for random posts on peoples blogs to discourse on or…?

Do you understand what “orientation” means?

It’s the same face. Maybe rotated or flipped in some cases, but the point is the guy couldn’t be assed to draw the face differently for any of his comics. It’s laziness, and it really shows in his comics; his characters always look like rigid, unexpressive zombies. You can have characters with dynamic expressions and a face that isn’t so rigid without going off model.

Do you?

OH MY GOD, FACES FROM DIFFERENT ANGLES!

and on the subject of calvin and hobbes…

now, I don’t got no fancy photoshop, but I’m also not dumb as shit like apparently you are, so I can see those are almost identical when rotated to the same angle with one or two exceptions (such as in the top row, the final image has a wider smile more similar to the bottom images - amazingly artists’ styles evolve over time! LIKE THE TEN YEARS CALVIN AND HOBBES WAS PUBLISHED FOR). 

Does the guy default to the ¾ flattened side view often? Yes. Too much? Perhaps, but if I were getting paid probably not that much by buzzfeed I would probably not care too much about that either - and that besides the point where it’s easy for artists to stick with a familiar pose and not realise, which I’m aware of after a rather embarassing moment in my IB Art mock exam when this was pointed out to me…

Now maybe if you actually created anything, rather than opening your mouth and let all the shit in your brain fall out, you might appreciate the limitations and issues that face anyone trying to create or design things. But as it is, alas, we have to have your mental diarrhea smearing along the inside of our computer screens instead.

Also in the spirit of “call-out culture” which you so delight to engage in, I’d point out that all of the girls in the “basically pedophilia” anime you reblog have literally the same face with different hairstyles so, there’s that too :>

“… I’d point out that all of the girls in the “basically pedophilia” anime you reblog have literally the same face with different hairstyles so, there’s that too :>”

(Source: reddit.com, via blergness)

wizardlycatpants:

the-last-punbender:

vanilla-bean-meme-machine:

D&D writing prompt: Write a D&D adventure in the style of a famous author

GRRM: At the end of the first session I kill the PCs. Next session I tell them about how the NPCs from their backstories are getting killed and captured by the villains. Then the session after THAT I let them roll stats for the surviving backstory NPCs.

Brandon Sanderson: after like 3 sessions we start a new campaign with new characters. A few sessions into that, we start again. Then we go back to the first one. Then we start a 4th. Around this point, you all find out that actually, all of these campaigns take place in the same universe and you keep running into this one asshole NPC in every campaign. You meet 4 times/week.

Robert Jordan: The campaign is really good overall, but there are a lot of side quests and random adventures. It started with 5 PCs, but then they split the party, and some other friends wanted to play too, so now there are 20 PCs running around. This game has been going on for about twelve years, then I die and a friend who’s been following the story but hasn’t played takes over the campaign to finish it off.

Terry Pratchett: You start off by raiding an ancient tomb. You steal the treasure, and the dead in the tomb rise. They don’t attack you. They start complaining, asking you if they wander into your house and steal your nice burial urns, no they don’t, so could you please put that back and stop screaming, you vitalist fucks? When you finally get out, you run into the city guards who are all level 15. They arrest you and you get tried for thieving without a license. There’s a dragon in the cell next to you. It didn’t pay its taxes.

I have some good news:

(Source: chicken-tamer, via byzandarius)

sufjanstevenscoverofhotlinebling:

goodposter:

sufjanstevenscoverofhotlinebling:

The best video ever posted on the internet is the scene from american psycho where they’re comparing business cards but someone edited it so they’re comparing like ridiculous forum signatures

where i want to see this

(via the-biscuit-thief)

bisexualcaptainkirk:

“This is Markarth, traveler, safest city in the Reach”

Me, on my 374838th playthrough of Skyrim:

Originally posted by dontwantthenextcommanderiwantyou

(Source: gothzenyatta, via starfeck)